25mm F1.7 XF APS-C for Fuji X, Large Aperture STM Auto Focus Lens for Fujifilm Fuji X-Mount Cameras X-E4 X-H1 X-Pro3 X-S10 X-T4 X-T10 X-T20 X-T30 XT30II X-T200 X-H2 X-H2S X-T5 X-S20 X-T50 X-M5

For a sub $200 lens for Fujifilm I highly recommend. Soft at f1.7, but I didnt run it lower than f2.8 and retained a lot of sharpness. Plenty of reviews on youtube of this lens. Very sharp, light and well made. It's not a hideous lens and looks like your typical Mirrorless lens.

Super fast delivery and it included a free 77mm UV filter, which was appreciated. 75mm roughly translates to a 112mm focal length when you compare it to full frame (1.5 crop). Very useful as it resides between the commonly used portrait focal lengths of 85mm and 135mm equivalents on APSC. This Viltrox lens has incredible construction quality. It’s not too heavy though on my XH2. The center of gravity when attached is easy to handle and much more of a pleasant experience than trying to fumble about with my large Canon RF lenses on my R5. Being a third party lens, I haven’t noticed any issues with the AF on my XH2. It seems to be snappy and locks onto the subject rather quickly. As far as image quality is concerned, I attached some images to this review where you can judge for yourself. I love to shoot wide open, so having the lens go to 1.2 was certainly in my wheelhouse. The bokeh on it is excellent. You’re basically getting 75mm bokeh at a 112mm perspective, which is going to still be a ton of liquidation when viewing focus falloff. rIt’s more football-shaped, which is fine by me. I know many like to compare this lens to the Fuji 56mm f/1.2, but comparing 56 to 75 doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. The compression is different. The closest Fuji comparison in terms of focal length is the XF80mm, but even that only goes to f/2.8 which is a HUGE gap from f.1.2. Therefore, this 75mm f/1.2 is a one of a kind gem with no real comparison being made by Fuji or any third party company. The Viltrox 75mm was super sharp, even wide open. I attached a shot of a model against a bright background to see if chromatic aberrations would be prominent. That shot was unedited with no lens corrections so you can just see how the lens handles those high contrast situations that usually plague portrait lenses. To my surprise, the CA was almost non-existent. That’s pretty rare for a third party lens in my experience. I’m enjoying the 75mm f/1.2 so much that now I’m interested in checking out the 13mm f/1.4.

Viltrox 56mm f/1.7 Review (on Fuji X-M1) THE TLDR REVIEW: Picked this up as a budget portrait lens for my old X-M1. Despite the camera’s age and weak AF, it performs really well. Build: Solid, a little front-heavy on the tiny X-M1 but manageable. AF: Works fine for stills, struggles in low light and with moving subjects. Image Quality: Sharp even wide open, great bokeh, lively colors. Handles tricky light better than expected. Manual tweaks in bright sun help. Use Case: Killer for portraits/headshots (85mm equivalent), also works for flowers, pets, and detail shots. ✅ Pros: sharp, creamy bokeh, good build, budget alternative to Fuji 56mm f/1.2 ❌ Cons: AF limited by older bodies, front-heavy on small cameras, no weather sealing Verdict: For portraits and engagement shots, it’s a steal. Punches way above its price, especially if you don’t mind working around the AF quirks. THE LONG REVIEW: I picked up the Viltrox 56mm f/1.7 as a budget-friendly portrait lens to pair with my older Fujifilm X-M1. Since the X-M1 doesn’t have an EVF or the latest AF system, I was curious to see if this modern lens would still shine. After a few weeks of shooting portraits, cats, flowers, even some macro-style close-ups, here are my thoughts. Build & Handling The lens feels solid but not overly heavy, which balances surprisingly well on the smaller X-M1 body. The aperture ring clicks in 1/3 stops, though it’s electronic rather than mechanical like Fujinon glass. Focus ring is smooth, and overall it feels better built than I expected at this price point. On a tiny camera like the X-M1, it looks a bit front-heavy, but not in a way that ruins usability. Autofocus On a modern Fuji body, AF would likely be snappier, but even on the X-M1, I’ve found it to be reliable. Eye detection isn’t an option on this body, but the lens still grabs focus quickly enough on static subjects. Tracking a bee in flight or a cat in low light isn’t perfect, but considering my camera’s age, I was impressed it nailed as many shots as it did. It does have some issues in low light. Image Quality This is where the lens really delivers: Sharpness: Wide open at f/1.7, the center sharpness is great. Stopping down improves edges, but even wide open it’s crisp enough for portraits. I do recommend manually adjusting some things in higher sun light days and playing around with manual vs letting your camera and this lens do its thing. I get better shots this way. Bokeh: Smooth and creamy. Backgrounds melt away without the “nervous” look some budget lenses have. My flower and bee shots show just how nicely the subject pops. Color & Contrast: Colors are lively and clean. The greens in woodland shots are rich without looking overcooked, and yellows pop against softer backgrounds. Low Light: In the cat photo by the window, the lens handled tricky light beautifully. Shadow detail is there, highlights don’t blow out, and sharpness holds even with limited light. Use Case This lens shines as a portrait lens. On APS-C, the 56mm focal length works out to about 85mm equivalent, which is the sweet spot for headshots and engagement photos. Flattering compression, subject isolation, and lovely background blur. But it’s also versatile enough for close-up nature work (flowers, insects) and even detail/textures. It’s not a true macro, but the rendering makes small subjects look great. Pros Excellent sharpness for the price, even wide open Creamy bokeh with no harsh edges Solid build, feels more premium than expected Colors and contrast are punchy yet natural Affordable alternative to Fuji’s 56mm f/1.2 Cons Slightly front-heavy on small bodies like the X-M1 AF is limited by older Fuji bodies (not a lens flaw, but worth noting) Electronic aperture ring lacks the tactile feel of Fujinon glass Not weather-sealed Final Thoughts On an older body like the Fuji X-M1, the Viltrox 56mm f/1.7 still delivers excellent results. For portraits and headshots, it’s a no-brainer. Sharp subjects, smooth bokeh, and rich colors make it feel like a much pricier lens. For engagement shoots, it’s exactly the look you want without breaking the bank. While it won’t replace true macro or Fuji’s f/1.2 flagship, it’s an amazing value lens that punches far above its weight.

I took this lens with me to France and Portugal over the summer. It takes very beautiful photos, I didn’t have any problems with the autofocus. It doesn’t do very well in low light, but that’s the only issue I had. Overall, this is a great budget lens and I’m definitely going to buy other lenses from the same brand.

Sharp lens, usual Viltrox excellent value

The full metal construction and overall feel of the lens is great, but the optics are subpar at best, if you're shooting in overcast or low contrast areas, 2.0 - 8.0 are pretty good looking... but in brighter or high contrast areas 1.4 up until about 5.6+ is terrible with refraction and chromatic aberration. I had to return this and the 33mm for a refund because they were just unusable for what I needed them for. I switched to the 27mm f1.2 and have been happily shooting nearly everything with it!

Very nice super wide lens. Great for the price.

Muy bueno