









🎧 Elevate your everyday sound with sleek style and packable power!
The JVC HAS160B FLATS are lightweight, foldable on-ear headphones featuring 30mm Neodymium drivers for clear sound, soft ear pads for comfort and noise isolation, and an iPhone-compatible plug with media controls. Available in six vibrant colors, they combine portability and style for music, travel, and gaming.





| ASIN | B004JRYLG4 |
| Age range (description) | Adult |
| Best Sellers Rank | 228 in Foldable Headphones |
| Cable feature | Tangle Free |
| Compatible devices | iPhones |
| Control method | Remote |
| Control type | Media Control |
| Department | Electronics |
| Guaranteed software updates until | unknown |
| Item model number | HAS160B |
| Item weight | 66 Grams |
| Manufacturer | JVC |
| Material | Plastic |
| Number of items | 1 |
| Package type | Standard Packaging |
| Product Dimensions | 22 x 3 x 15.8 cm; 66 g |
| Recommended uses for product | Music, Travel, Calling |
| Specific uses for product | Music, Travel, Gaming |
| Style | Contemporary" or "Modern |
| Unit count | 1 Count |
| Water resistance level | Not Water Resistant |
S**S
Tougher than they look.
Comfortable to wear in bed. These are my second purchase, I use them to listen to music that helps me relax enough to fall to sleep. Good value for money.
P**L
SO good for the price.
I used my Altec Studio headphones when working, and these when at home. Really good range for the price
D**S
REVIEW: JVC HAS160B FLATS Lightweight Headband Headphones (Black)
Cheap / value-for-money, but certainly not nasty. I bought these ultra-cheap 'phones to host quick video calls and the like at my computer and for the price, they do the job very well indeed. A wide frequency spectrum is covered to provide a wide array of sound transmission and clarity is sufficient to do most jobs, even for the occasional listening of music when one does not have time to run around looking for one's more expensive headphones, etc. Can fully endorse. Please note that these phones are for listening "one-way" and do not incorporate a separate voice microphone, so, if/when used for, e.g., video calls, one will need to speak directly into one's computer/phone. A cheap-but-decent nice to have set of spare 'phones.
D**F
Fabulous for listeing on the go
These JVC ones are perfect: they provide really good base and low tones whilst showing excellent high tones. the price was a bit more expensive than good in ear ones but I would happily recommend these.
R**B
Five Stars
These are really good. Nice and light with a good sound.
M**E
Five Stars
great
K**T
Did the job
Well worth the money
D**G
Entry level headphone with great sound quality at affordable price. Cord is quite thin but if you handle the item with care, it should last as the design is sturdy and easy to handle. Compact and foldable with very little sound leakage.
E**A
Son comodísimos para quienes les molestan los intra auriculares, muy ligeros y el sonido bastante bueno si no eres un D. J. profesional o algo así. Estoy muy contenta con ellos. Por ponerle alguna pega, no son plegables, sería interesante que lo fueran para guardarlos más protegidos. ✌🏼😊
S**H
These are plug in 3.5mm the quest 3 has a 3.5mm jack and 0 lag. The sound is great. But first the fit. Was not great at first but I used a lighter and heated the ends where the angel was great and pushed out the sides. I refused the angel to almost perfect straight. I bent the top and sides a bit very easy. Took less then 5 mins to do the whole modification. I put the earphones on and quest 3 with the bobovr s3pro over then. All is very comfortable I do not feel headphones one top or side of head just the muffs lightly on ears. I put on youtube and put on a song from pink Floyd dark side of the moon and turn quest 3 volume right up and waited then the clicking of clocks started. Next thing I know the song goes way loud and the instruments sounded crisp no distortion vocals also sound great. I think this is a way better setup for quest 3 then Bluetooth as I can't find any that don't lag and they lag bad. I tried 5 pair Samsung and Apple and several off shore that were good at the time of purchase for what they were for. Also these are small and light compared to the earmuffs type headphones I grew up with. I would give these 5 stars no problem So I added a couple pics for ya you can see in the one how straight the ends are now that brought the sides in. In other pic you can see muffs on ear and go under strap . They don't touch side of head neither does the strap. Strap is about 1 cm maybe 1.5cm from head so lots of room for the headphone headband.
A**E
Die Kopfhörer habe ich bereits das zweite Mal bestellt. Der Klang ist super und für die Stadt sind sie handlich und nicht zu schwer.
F**N
I have been on a search for over the ear or on-ear headphones that when used with a laptop sound good, are not expensive, and (here's the big eliminator) are comfortable to wear. I am going to compare 4 phones which are readily available: Panasonic RP- HT 21 (current prices as of 4/12 - $4.49), Koss Portapro ($18.72), JVC HA-S160-B ($14.23) and AKG K240 (4.5) ($93.90) The AKG's were to be used as a sound benchmark. I listen mostly to classical music, soundtracks, and jazz. I used the following music: Katsarsis playing the Kreisler Praeludium, Rattle and the LA Philharmonic doing the adagio from Rachmaninoff's 2nd Symphony, and von Karajan and the Berlin doing the opening of Strauss's Thus Sprach Zarathustra. The phones were powered only by a laptop because that is what most people will use lightweight phones for (that or other small listening devices) For that reason the AKG's were not a good choice because it could not reach even moderately high sound levels from my Toshiba laptop. The sound was super smooth on the AKG's but the lightweights were more compatible with the laptop. The Panasonics sound good with mid range music, like the Kreisler piano music, but their weakness showed in the Strauss. They could not handle the complex, loud tones with any finesse. I give the JVC's a small edge sonically over the Koss's overall because while they both handled detail and loud volume about the same, the JVC showed a bit more reality in the music. By that I mean, e.g., horns sounded more like horns and not synthesized sound. Both Koss and JVC allowed you to hear the decay and space in the Strauss opening. Now, on to comfort. The Panasonics are very small and light and one can wear them for a long time without even noticing them. The Koss's have a clumsy headband, and I found the pressure on the ear uncomfortable after 15 minutes or so. The JVC's, which use a simple headband, were almost as comfortable as the Panasonics. The AKG's, like many over the ear phones, started becoming oppressive after 15 minutes. Note: I have a large head and this comfort level assessment may not be true for people with smaller noggins. I would use the Panasonics for times when they might receive heavy handling, such as when commuting on public transportation. They are cheap (and a real bargain) so damage will not be costly. The Koss were just a bit too clumsy to use - Koss needs to abandon its weird headband design. The JVCs were a clear choice for everyday listening with smaller devices. I think the AKG's just need a real amplifier to power them. In short, I thought the JVC's were a clear winner in this bargain/comfort category.
Trustpilot
1 day ago
2 months ago