[Casio] Casio Standard Digital Watch W800H-1A [Parallel Import]

私(男性)は手首回りがまあまあ太く 21センチから22センチありますが、 ベルトが長く穴が4つ余ります。 デザインもとてもカッコイイし、 10年電池寿命があるのも魅力です。 リピートでまた買おうと思います。 大変満足しております。

防水、狂わない精度、見やすい、軽い、機能もバッチリ、しかも安いから気を使わない！ 普段なら最強 おしゃれのときはいい奴ね

レビューでいくつか言われるとおり視認性、機能性共に最高です。曜日、時間、年度、日付、アラーム設定などが一発で確認できます。ストップウォッチ、アラーム、ライトと必要な機能もついており、２４時間表記、１２時間表記をボタン一回で変更可能。 手首を曲げたとき、ボタンにあたってしまうと変わってしまったりすることが何回かありましたが、ボタン配置的に当たるのはライトボタンと２４時間表記のボタンのみなのでこれはそれほど大きな問題はではないといえます。 防水もついてるので仕事で濡れ仕事があってもへっちゃらです。 おおよそ腕時計に必要なものはすべてつまっていると言えるのではないでしょうか。 体感ですが、２ヶ月に一回くらい時間を設定しなおしてやると１分以上の時間の狂いは発生しないと思います。 もともとは仕事で使用するために、軽くて腕への負担が少なく、汚そうが、紛失しようが盗まれようが壊そうが一切気にならない。そんな腕時計を探していましてこれに行き着きました。 チープな外観は休日に決してつけないぞ、という謎の決心を促します。ダサいです。実用に特化してるがために、休日に顔を背けたくなる。そんな素晴らしいデザインです。 たぶんまた買うと思います。 しかしいくつか欠点というか気になる点があります。 何度か落としてしまったことがありまして、そのときにしばらく画面が暗くなってしばらく応答せず、復活すると時間がリセットされるということが何度かありました。案外壊れやすいと思います。 そしてライトのカラーです。黄緑です。 これは好みの問題なのですが、黄緑はちょっと古いなーって思います。きれいな緑系か、ブルー系だと嬉しいのですが…

値段以上でも以下でもなく、仕事使いにはちょうどよかったです。

チプカシの中で、最強ではないでしょうか。

iPadやスピーカーなど磁性の強い製品が近くにあり、アナログ時計が頻繁にダメになるので まだデジタルの方がましかとG-Shockを購入しましたが、ガッチリしすぎてワイシャツの袖口から はみ出して結構 邪魔になってしまったので、試しに薄そうなデジタル時計として購入しました。 購入してみて感じたのは、軽く・薄く・画面認識性も高く 時計としては十分なものと感じました。

10年電池がもちます。 バンドが長いので、腕の太い方でも大丈夫。

きもち小さい、でも見やすい！

Beste

أصلية والشاشة مناسبة

Très bien fonctionne très bien comme dans le temps

Received in quick time,,, very nice looking watch

Bought this 2 years and 8 months ago and it's still great. In that time, it's drifted 27 seconds (e.g. at 8:00:00 it now reads 8:00:27). **EDIT** This drift is inaccurate. Updated at bottom of review **END EDIT**. For me, that's not a big deal, but figured I'd mention it. I wear the watch face-side down on my wrist, but it only accrued one mild scratch in all that time. Nothing terrible. I bought this watch because it had 3 things; the 24-hour time, the day of the week, and the date on a single screen. It's the only watch I've found that had all 3 of those. To find all 3 in a highly rated and CHEAP watch? I bought it in a second and haven't regretted it since. I actually returned a better and more expensive watch (Casio DW5600E-1V) before eventually finding and loving this. I especially love that it orders the date in Year-Month-Day format. I live in the US where Month-Day-Year is the norm, but I also work with thousands of computer files where the best way to organize files by date is with a Year-Month-Day system (e.g. 221102 for November 2, 2022). It's just a little nothing thing, but I love this watch for it. I should note that the watch band snapped off back in August, 2 years and 5 months after getting the watch. That's happened with other watches with resin bands that I've owned, always around the 2-3 year mark. I heard it's from sweat or showers hardening the resin or something. That could make sense as I never take mine off except when I'm rock climbing. Regardless, I just grabbed a cheap 18mm silicone watch strap for 12.99 and it's been fine ever since (bought silicone because I heard they don't snap. I'll update this if it ever does). I plan to use this watch forever. If it breaks, I'll buy a new one for the price of a burger + onion rings. I've gone through a dozen watches over the past 25 years or so, but this is the first one that I loved. It has everything I want without a bunch of other useless expensive crap that I'll never use (looking at you, altimeter; and that's coming from a hiker). It's cheap, reliable (anecdotally), has a fast band replacement process, no feature-bloat, has large text, and is DECENTLY water resistant. The only downside is that the watch isn't 200m water resistant. If it was, it'd be perfect for me. Anyway, I don't go surfing/swimming with it, but it hasn't fogged up after 2+ years of showers, rain, sweat, etc. If you want a cheap watch, I recommend this one (unless you're an avid surfer). Or if you're like me and willing to fork over $100 for a watch, maybe buy this anyway. It's certainly much better than the $21 price-tag would have you believe. **EDIT** 12/12/23 I made the above review over a year ago, but I realized that I couldn't verify that the 27 seconds of drift was accurate. Well, I decided to run a little experiment over the past year and record the drift every few months (basically whenever I remembered I was even doing this) and it turns out that the drift WASN'T accurate. After a year, my watch drifted 58 seconds. To get that 27 second value, I might have reset my watch whenever we had daylight saving time or something, hence the inaccurate drift. Anyway, I included the recorded values below (MM/DD/YY format) in case someone is interested. Also, I used time.gov for the baseline comparison. 12/11/22 9:55PM - 0 seconds fast 01/19/23 6:18PM - 5 seconds fast 02/22/23 12:48PM - 10.5 seconds fast 04/15/23 9:00PM - 18.5 seconds fast 05/08/23 8:22PM - 22 seconds fast 06/27/23 12:52PM - 30 seconds fast 09/06/23 8:15PM - 41 seconds fast 11/05/23 7:18PM - 51 seconds fast 12/11/23 9:55PM - 58 seconds fast This basically means my watch drifts by a little more than 1 second every week (1sec/~6.29days). For my needs, that's fine. I'm not doing anything in my daily life that requires long-term precision to the second, and I have to reset it every so often anyway for the aforementioned daylight saving time, so I don't mind at all. Other than that, the watch still works great (nearing 4 years now) and the "new" silicone watchband is still great too (although it hasn't hit that 2-3 year breakdown point yet). So, all in all, still happy with it.