Elements of Petroleum Geology
R**E
Disappointing. Could have and should have been better.
The book needed a writing editor and a technical editor. Some sentences are hard to read. A sentence that read fine in the third edition is tough to read because the same words have been moved around. It has so many inconsistencies and errors that I stopped marking them. Too many figures are hard to read. Few of the references are current. Average age of refences by chapter: 1: 1960; 2: 1972; 3: 1983; 4: 1976; 5: 1971; 6: 1977; 7: 1972; 8: 1974; 9: 1987; 10: 2013; 11: 2017; and 12: 1986. This is for a book with a publication date of 2023. It's as if the authors took the third edition and added a few recent developments. My personal peeve is with their comments about fractured reservoirs on page 320 since I live in Ventura, California. They state that Monterey reservoirs have low recovery rates. Many do; however, a well in the Santa Barbara Channel produced more than 30 million barrels in its first 16 years of production, and several offshore California wells produced more than 10 million barrels.
Trustpilot
1 month ago
1 month ago