From Library Journal Napoleon scholar Nafziger details one of the bloodiest campaigns of world history in this 1988 title. In addition to a hefty text, this also offers numerous maps and appendixes that include everything from treaties, political documents, and orders of battle for the numerous units to lists of supplies, the numbers of troops and their locations, and more. A truly exhaustive reference.Copyright 1998 Reed Business Information, Inc. Read more Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. The causes of the 1812 campaign can be said to have had their roots in the military rivalry between France and Russia and the economic rivalry between France and England, but the first shots of this campaign are found in a series of decrees issued in 1806 that gave birth to what was known as the “Continental System.” England and France were fighting for the economic domination of Europe.   The term “Continental System” was coined by Napoleon to describe the system by which he intended to defeat England after his efforts to defeat the British navy on the high seas had failed. England was not a self-sufficient country and depended on both its imports of raw materials and its continental markets for its existence. Napoleon hoped that by cutting off these markets he could ruin the British economy and force the British to submit to his will. In addition, Napoleon had the second goal of forcing the Continental states into a total economic dependence on the industrial exports of France, which would give him an economical dominance to match his military dominance of Europe.   Napoleon hoped that he could pursue these goals with the cooperation and approval of his Continental allies. He spent much time condemning Britain's maritime policies, such as the exclusion of non-British products from Britain's colonies and Britain's seizure of the colonies of many of the Continental states. Napoleon postured and posed as the defender of the Continental interests against an unprincipled Britain.   The institution of the Continental System began with the British declaration that the entire coast of the Continent from Brest to the Elbe was in a state of blockade. This was instituted on 16 May 1806. In retaliation. Napoleon closed the entire north German coast of Friesland to British goods.   This situation remained unchanged until late 1806, when the Prussians were beaten by Napoleon. When Prussia ceased to be a military threat to Napoleon, he proceeded to seal off the major commercial cities of Hamburg, Bremen, and Lubeck. This provided a “hermetic seal” against British goods on the Atlantic coast of Germany. He also began the process of seizing all of the British goods that were to be found in those territories. The significance of this move was great because those cities were the principal conduits by which Britain shipped her goods into Europe.   The immediate result of these orders was the seizure of massive quantities of British goods and the enrichment of Napoleon's war treasury. Napoleon's next step was the issuance of the famous Berlin Decrees on 12 November 1806. The preamble of the decree denounced the British blockade of 16 May as a violation of recognized international law. The text of the decree stated that the British Isles were, themselves, in a state of blockade, forbade all trade in British goods, ordered the arrest of all British subjects in allied states, made all British goods liable to seizure, and refused port access to any vessel coming directly from Britain or any of her colonies, or that had called on one of those ports since the issuance of the decree.   The decree applied to all of France's allies and, in theory, formed a counterblockade against British financial incursion extending from north-em Germany to Italy, excluding Portugal. Lacking a fleet, Napoleon was unable to actually enforce his blockade of Britain, so the results of this decree were felt principally by the neutrals engaged in commerce, who ran the risk of capture by French privateers.   Those Continental states that were not allies also felt pressure to comply with the decree. Napoleon's victorious armies provided a strong incentive, often stronger than the state's desire for British trade.   Napoleon's aim was to expand the economic isolation of Britain by eventually sealing off every Continental state. Napoleon knew this endeavor would result in serious economic privations for France and her allies, but he also knew that the impact would be even greater, fatal he hoped, on Britain.   Britain's only defense against this decree was to penetrate the blockade with as much commerce as possible. The first British reprisals were the Orders in Council of 7 January 1807. These orders forbade neutrals to trade between the ports of France and her allies, under pain of seizure and the confiscation of ship and cargo. This action, again, was felt primarily by the neutrals like America and Denmark. To these neutrals, these acts were more damaging than the Berlin Decree, as Britain had the navy to enforce its sanction. The impact of these orders on France was minimal.   Napoleon's seal on Continental trade was not complete. The War of the Fourth Coalition, the 1805-1807 campaigns, was terminated by the Treaty of Tilsit. It had several provisions that related to the Berlin Decree and it closed Prussian and Russian ports to Britain. After the signing of the treaty, only Austria, Portugal, Denmark, Sweden, and parts of Italy still traded with Britain.   Of these states, Denmark had special significance. Its geographical location at the mouth of the Baltic forced the British to act quickly. Britain offered Denmark a secret defense alliance. In return for this alliance, the Danes were to turn over their fleet to the British for safekeeping until peace was reestablished. Needless to say, the Danes refused to submit to those humiliating terms. Britain's response was to invade Denmark and seize its fleet on 5 September 1807. This action gave much credence to Napoleon's charges and resulted in the immediate conclusion of a military alliance between Denmark and France. Denmark was now in the Continental System.   As Napoleon began his plans for the invasion of Portugal, Czar Alexander of Russia declared war on Britain. Russia was unable to actively engage British forces, but chose to make military moves against Sweden, who still traded with Britain. Russia invaded and took Finland, which it had long coveted. The successful conquest of Finland left only Portugal as a major port of entry for British commerce to Europe, and Britain was faced with the need to devise other methods to penetrate the Continent.   Britain responded with a new set of Orders in Council that were to do to France's commerce what France was doing to Britain's commerce. All ports that were closed to British commerce were declared blockaded and subject to the same restrictions as if a British fleet were actually posted in their roads. All trade articles from states adhering to the Continental System or their colonies were declared lawful prizes, as were the vessels that carried them. This last move further penalized the neutral states.   However, in an effort to win over the neutrals, Britain permitted direct neutral trade between any British port and any enemy colonial port, other neutral port, or enemy colonial ports not actually blockaded by a British fleet. In addition, trade with Continental ports was permitted, but this could be done only if the neutral vessel put into a British port and paid charges that were essentially equal to the import duties into Britain, before proceeding to the enemy ports.   This system favored British products, since they did not require a reexport certificate, and especially favored sugar, coffee, and cotton carried in British bottoms. The principal thrust of this plan was to force all goods bound for the Continent through British ports.   The next move was Napoleon's. On 17 December 1807 he issued the Milan Decree. This declared that all ships that submitted to a search by the British on the high seas lost their national character, were “denationalized,” and were declared lawful prizes if captured by a French or allied privateer. The decree went on to state that every vessel that put into a British port or a British colonial port was also a lawful prize.   The Milan Decree was the logical conclusion of the economic war that was building in intensity. It was declared that there were no more neutrals and forced a declaration of alliance by all states.   As a result, many neutrals now faced economic ruin. In response, the United States of America issued the Embargo Act of 1807. This resulted in so much self-inflicted punishment that it was repealed in March 1809. The Americans replaced it with the Non-Intercourse Act, which prohibited trade only with Britain, France, and their colonies. It was repealed in 1810, and new legislation was written which stated that if either belligerent repealed its decrees against American shipping, the Americans would reinstitute the sanctions of the Non-Intercourse Act against the other belligerent.   Napoleon's concern now became how to maintain his system's airtight seal against British trade and how to bring those few states outside of the Continental System into it. His next step was to invade Portugal in 1808.   The year 1808 saw broad advances for Napoleon's Continental System. Portugal was quickly overrun and Austria was forced to break with England and join the System. The Kingdom of Tuscany was annexed, as were Corsica and Elba. In Italy, only the Papal States were outside the System. This was quickly changed by a total occupation of the Italian peninsula by the end of 1808. France also occupied the Adriatic island of Corfu, another point of entry.   Read more
M**D
The research is phenominal!
In Napoleon's Invasion of Russia is a history of this campaign, but there are tables of organization and equipment for both the Grand Army of Napoleon and the Russian Army of Kutuzov not just for the battle of Borodino, but from June 24th of 1812 when Napoleon first crossed into Russia. This is one of the most valuable reference books I've ever seen! It goes to the battalion, squadron and battery level of every unit of infantry, cavalry and artillery giving the number of officers, men and guns (including the caliber of each gun)! As I am making models of both of these armies in 15mm and 28mm scales for using in wargames, I could not have a better reference! The Nafziger Collection, also available through amazon.com, is a good resource for painting the uniforms of these units. It even gives the names of commanding officers down to regimental level.I am consentrating on Marshal Ney's IIIrd French and allied Corps and the Russian units that the IIIrd Corps actually fought against. I am seeking fellow Napoleonic wargamers who have the miniatures for the other French and Russian Corps of the 1812 Invasion of Russia. They will need this book. We will then need a gymnasium in which to deploy our armies if in the larger scale and on a colossal mechanical table, preferably on tracks that can open up so we can walk between the sections to make our moves, close the table and then spend time for taking photographs of this magnificent little spectacle!Most standard 4'x6' gaming tables can barely accomodate a division-sized Napoleonics game in 28mm scale.Any takers?-- Michael G. EnglandGrapevine, Texas
J**O
Five Stars
From a military point of view you can not expect more.
R**R
A Military History of the Epic Invasion
This is primarily a military history of Napoleons ill-fated 1812 Russian venture. The author provides detailed orders of battle for both armies and much description of the actual composition of these huge forces. Nafziger's attention to deatil is truly impressive and the reader who seeks detailed Orders of Battle information will find exactly that here.What makes this book different from the standard 1812 histories is the emphasis not only on military aspects, but on the lesser known movements of the French allied Corps-de-Armees operating on the flanks of the main invasion. Here we get to learn about the fighting which involved the Austrian and Prussian auxilurary corps which comprised a significant portion of Macdonald's, Oudinots and Reynier's Corps. These formatons maneuvered extensively on the flanks of Napoleons main advance in the center. They fought a number of minor and sometimes larger engagements to secure the flanks and threaten the Russian cities of Riga and Minsk. The notable action at Polotsk which involved Oudinot's Corps gets an extensive description. This battle is usually mentioned just in passing with most histories of 1812.Again, this is primarily a military history of the 1812 Invasion. Those seeking a more general work will likely be disppointed here. The author does not spend much time with background events here believing rightly so that this has been covered extensively elewhere. There are plenty of well written, general histories on this topic. This is a work for military history buffs and Wargamers who will find an abundance of minutiae here.There is a large addenda with maps which unfortunately in this edition of the book were hard to read. The small size of map detail was difficult to trace movements at times, but to find any maps of some of these lesser known actions was interesting. A fine, detailed, even classic military history of the 1812 Invasion. Good to read after gaining an adequate background from other related books.
P**S
Good OBs, includes small battles, facts, etc.
Nafziger has created a tome of detail, once again. The order of battles provided are very useful for doing research on the armies during the Russian campaign. The book is filled good detail and maps on many of the small clashes and conflicts between Napoleon's multi-national force and the Russians.Nafziger has included the text of some of the treaties binding his allies and an interesting account of the Prussian seperation and eventual capitulation during the retreat.For anyone simulating or gaming the period, the book contains many hand drawn maps, which are very nice, with orders of battle and narrative accounts of the minor clashes and fringe battles.I find the corps orders of battle indispensable for recreating the armies in miniature figurines. There is little or no uniform data, and some of the army descriptions (i.e. Berg, Saxon, Westphalian, etc.) are merely general descriptions, but Nafziger shows exacting and meticulous detail in providing "facts" in the order of battle and force compositions. He provides Corps, Division and Brigade breakdowns, including commanders name, unit names, number of battalions or squadrons, number and size of attached regimental guns, number of pioneer companies, nationality, etc. for the French and French allies. The same level of detail is provided for the Russian forces.
Trustpilot
3 weeks ago
5 days ago