🗑️ Elevate Your Waste Game with Style!
The Plasticplace Custom Fit Trash Bags are designed specifically for simplehuman Code E trash cans, offering a perfect fit with no messy overhangs. Each bag boasts a tear-resistant thickness of 1.0 Mil and a generous capacity of 5.2 gallons. With 100 bags in a convenient package, these reinforced drawstring liners are the ideal solution for your waste management needs.
| Brand | Plasticplace |
| Capacity | 5.2 Gallons |
| Unit Count | 100.0 Count |
| Recommended Uses For Product | Garbage Liners |
| Material Feature | Reißfest |
| Color | White |
| Material | Plastic |
| Item Form | Bag |
| Scent | Unscented |
| Number of Items | 1 |
| Item Weight | 1.52 Kilograms |
| Item dimensions L x W x H | 7.48 x 3.74 x 7.08 inches |
| Net Content Weight | 3.66 Pounds |
| Manufacturer | Plasticplace |
| UPC | 818331023151 |
| Global Trade Identification Number | 00818331023151 |
| Part Number | (x) |
| Item Weight | 3.35 pounds |
| Product Dimensions | 7.48 x 3.74 x 7.08 inches |
| Country of Origin | China |
| Item model number | TRA145WH |
| Size | 100 Count (Pack of 1) |
| Style | Code E |
| Item Package Quantity | 1 |
| Number Of Pieces | 100 |
| Handle/Lever Placement | Top |
| Included Components | Trash Bags |
| Batteries Included? | No |
| Batteries Required? | No |
S**N
Great Bags vs Simple Human: a Tie
Because the reviews for GBFL are variable, and sometimes contradictory, at least as far as comparing them with Simple Human, I decided to do as straight a comparison as I could with the Simple Human E bags and GBFL E bags. Obviously not a scientific, double blind study, but still maybe useful.As the attached pics show, they are virutally identical in measurements (SH on the left). They each fit the relevant container about equally well, no overhang, no excess. Not sure why some reviewers say the GBFL bags don't fit. They do.And since some other reviewers say the GBFL are cheaply made compared to the Simple Human, I did a quick and dirty strength test: I put a 20lb dumbell in each and lifted each for 60 seconds. Neither failed; neither even showed any distortion after the dumbell was removed. GBFL says their bags are 1 mil thick. SH doesn't list a thickness but says theirs are "double-seamed." I found no difference in the seams or apparent thickness of either bag. I didn't try to see how long they could hold the weight before they failed. Neither seemed ready to break. 20 lbs of trash is a fair amount and 20 lbs of dumbell concentrated in the bottom of any bag for a minute is a fair comparison.The one real difference, for me at least, is the GBFL bags are much easier to dispense. The SH bags are a bit of a pain to get out and they insist on stuffing them in small outer bags, in batches of about 20. See the pic. So instead of getting 100 bags in one box you get 5 batches of 20 in 5 separate larger bags with a fairly tiny opening. It's like putting a batch of 100 envelopes inside five bigger envelopes at 20 a pop instead of just putting them all in one box. Just makes it more of a pain to get them out.Otherwise I could find no real difference. If the way they're packaged doesn't matter to you, it's a tie. Hope this helps.
L**L
Exact match
These trash bags are an exact match to the higher priced upper end bags. The fit is perfect. The quality is perfect. The price is perfect.
A**S
Title is misleading!
THIS PRODUCT IS NOT FOR TYPE X!!! It is for type E!
Y**.
Excellent bags
Liked
N**E
Not as good as the real thing. But saves you money
Worth the money saved. But only 3/4 the quality.
A**R
Great product
Good product at good price
K**G
As good as SH……for less$$$
Works well…. Great product. True value
D**R
too thin the bags tear easyp
poor quality
Trustpilot
1 day ago
2 days ago