Deliver to Kenya
IFor best experience Get the App
Sweeten Your Life, Not Your Calories! 🍭
NAMANNA Pure Monk Fruit Sweetener is a revolutionary zero-calorie, zero-carb sweetener derived from 100% pure monk fruit. With 50% Mogroside V, it offers an incredibly sweet taste—250 to 300 times sweeter than sugar—making it an ideal choice for health-conscious individuals, diabetics, and families. Perfect for enhancing beverages and treats, this natural sweetener aligns with Paleo and Keto diets, ensuring you can enjoy sweetness without the guilt.
T**D
Slight taste adjustment, but worth it
tl;dr: Adds sweetness, but has a noticeably different taste from sugar or artificial sweeteners. A good taste, but different.I ordered this particular monk fruit extract because it seemed to be one of the few that was pure monk fruit, unadulterated with that digestive nightmare xylitol, or with maltodextrin or any other filler. Since it's my first time ordering monk fruit extract, I can't really compare it to any other brand.Went with the 25% mogroside V version because I'm cheap and the 50% just seemed too expensive. Came in a standard-size spice shaker. It's a fine, light-brown powder that flows out VERY easily, so take care when trying to use just a small amount.Warning: It smells like burnt plastic. Ignore that and use it anyway...it tastes much better than it smells.So far, I've used the monk fruit powder in peppermint tea, coffee (to which I'd added cacao powder for a bit of chocolate flavor), lemonade (water + bottled lemon juice), and a porridge of chia seeds, ground flaxseed, coconut flour, and cacao powder.What you really need to know is that monk fruit extract is NOT in any way a straight swap for sugar or artificial sweeteners. While it is very sweet, it DOES NOT taste the same. You WILL notice a difference. The question is whether it's a bad difference, and the answer, to me, is 'nope.'Many people in the reviews have mentioned how very little of it you need to use to get a sweetening effect. That has not been my experience. Maybe it's just my sweet tooth, but I have had to use more than I expected. Definitely not as much as sugar or Sweet n Low, my usual go-to, but more than I thought after reading all the reviews.Next time, I'll suck up the extra cost and try the 50%, instead of the 25%, because it's supposed to be much sweeter.OK, so as far as taste goes...it sweetened both my peppermint tea and coffee, while adding an additional taste that was, I dunno, maybe a little brown sugar-y and nutty. To me, it didn't seem to change the taste of the drinks so much as to enhance them for the better. I've come to prefer them WITH monk fruit, especially the coffee because the nutty effect seems stronger there.Using monk fruit in my lemonade, on the other hand, was no bueno. At all. Yuck. That burned plastic smell I mentioned? Well, that's how the lemonade tasted, too. Like sweet burned plastic. I mentioned this to my doctor in passing, and he said it may have had to do with a reaction between the citric acid and the monk fruit. I'll take his word for it because science.The monk fruit did exceptionally well in my porridge. Took considerably more than I expected to sweeten it to my preference, but did not seem to change the overall taste at all. There seemed to be little difference between using Sweet N Low and using the monk fruit. I was very pleased with the end result.Some of the reviews have mentioned that it's difficult to mix into drinks, recipes, etc because of the fine powder form. I didn't have any of those issues. Mixed readily into hot beverages, porridge, and even cold water (although it required a little bit of extra stirring).The bottom line for me is that I'll continue to use monk fruit to replace artificial sweeteners in most, but not all things. I like the taste and ease of use -- but not the price, although I understand why it costs more.Full disclosure: I had some minor digestive issues a few hours after using monk fruit the first time. Can't swear the two things are related, and the issues have not repeated. Take that for what it's worth.
E**A
Exactly what I was after.
I recently tried Organifi's Golden Tea, which is delicious, but a bit expensive so I was looking for alternatives. I noticed Monk's Fruit on the list of ingredients, and having never heard of it I dug in and figured out it was the sweetener. Organifi's Golden Tea is Goldilock's "Baby Bear" of sweet, in my opinion - "just right" - so my next step was to find Monk's Fruit that could be used as my sweetener.I went on the hunt with eyes wide open, read reviews of several of the highest rated Monk's Fruit offerings here on Amazon. I liked that this one didn't have any erythritol blended with it, or stevia, or anything else like that - it was just Monk's Fruit. The price was very reasonable, so I took the chance.And I am very pleased I did. It has a pleasant aroma, rather like dried honey, has the consistency of finely ground cinnamon, and is the color of warm butterscotch. I tried it in some blackberry tea - just sprinkled it in - and it dissolved very nicely. There is an aftertaste, it was sweet to me and not unpleasant at all. I also tried it with my "alternative" Golden Tea, and it was Baby Bear all over again - just right.Please bear in mind as you consider this that I prefer bitter things over sweet things to start with - black coffee, dark chocolate (at least 88% cocoa), dry red wine, things along these lines. It doesn't take much "sweet" for it to be "sweet enough" for me. Nothing can be sugar but sugar, but this is an excellent substitute for me. I will definitely buy this again.
X**G
Sugar is worse than cigarrette
This is my first experience to try a monkfruit product.I am health conscious about what I take into my body. Sugar is worse than cigarrette, but the taste is good.One day I saw one of my friends cooking with this monkfruit product as sugar alternative. Out of curiosity, I ordered this one. In a couple of days, it was on my hand.In the first a few days, I used my finger to get only a tiny bit of it and taste it. It is so sweet that I was really impressed. However, the taste is still different from that of sugar.It took me a few days to get used to the pure taste. Then I was comfortable to put a little into my food. Gradually I got used to ilthe taste. It tastes sweet, more like curry but it is like sweet curry. I can use it to cook from one kind of food to another. knowing this is a healthy product, I feel ok to use it more often than usual.This package looks small. But it is so sweet, I only consume a small portion. I expect it to last 4 weeks before I order the next one.This is a terrific product for the health conscious consumers like me.The only one improvement I will recommend is to package a tiny spoon with it so that I can measure it accurately each time I use it. But I am getting better in using the right volume now.Try one for yourself.
G**K
Healthier than Stevia, and tastes much better. Aspertame, Sucralose, etc. could ruin your health!
Healthy alternative to sugar, without the strong bitter taste of Stevia. Furthermore, Stevia is extensively processed to remove some (not all) it's bitterness. This process typically leaves unhealthy chemicals behind. Monk Fruit tastes much better than Stevia, although it works much better in some foods (especially liquids) than others. (Aspertame, Sucralose, etc. are unhealthy choices which for me would never be considered for use.)In some things Monk Fruit tastes like sugar. An example is in hot tea with lots of half-and-half (the way I like it). But there are other things in which it does not taste good, especially if it's not a liquid, or otherwise fails to get completely dissolved. Whatever it does not taste as good in, normally a liquid form of Monk Fruit Extract works well--the liquid extract tastes just like sugar, and with no unpleasant or bitter taste. I always want to have both around. They usually come in about 2 oz. bottles.
Trustpilot
1 month ago
1 week ago