![The Amazing Spider-Man [4K UHD]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/819MzufUqUL._AC_SL3840_.jpg)


Buy anything from 5,000+ international stores. One checkout price. No surprise fees. Join 2M+ shoppers on Desertcart.
Desertcart purchases this item on your behalf and handles shipping, customs, and support to Kenya.
Teenage social outcast Peter (Andrew Garfield) spends his days trying to unravel the mystery of his own past and win the heart of his high school crush, Gwen Stacy (Emma Stone). A mysterious briefcase belonging to his father, who abandoned him when he was a child, leads Peter to his dad’s former partner, Dr. Connors. The discovery of his father’s secret will ultimately shape his destiny of becoming “Spider-Man” and bring him face to face with Connors’ villainous alter ego, the Lizard. Blu-ray Disc Special Features Audio Commentary With Marc Webb, Avi Arad and Matt Tolmach Deleted Scenes A Hero Will Rise Making Of Featurette Exclusive Look Behind The Scenes Of The Amazing Spider-Man And more… Review: An unnecessary, but very well-done reboot - One thing I wish about Spider-Man: that Sony would release the contract to Marvel Studios so Spidey can be in the Avengers where he belongs. But until that glorious day, Spidey will be forced to live on the silver screen all alone with a set of villains that have yet to be in the movies. Sure, I think I read that The Rhino will be in the next one, which is great since Rhino is one of the classics that, until modern CGI technology, couldn't really be done the right way. The previous three films by Sam Raimi were amazing...well, the first two were amazing, but not number three. Ick, not number three. I mean, Topher Grace as Eddie Brock? Did they even read the comic books? Come on Sam, no wonder there was a needed reboot just a few years later. And why throw in the Sandman AND Green Goblin's son back into the mix? It was too much, and therefore nothing was done to the fullest. In my opinion, they should've just stuck to the Venom suit and cast someone much more comic-book-related as Eddie Brock...someone with a more sinister voice. OK, this is just a ranting history lesson leading up to the real review of the reboot. I LOVED this film for many, many reasons. First, the casting was much more well-done. Andrew Garfield plays a much more believable Peter Parker (lankier, goofier, and much more natural on-screen as a nerd than Toby MacGuire). And they didn't include Mary Jane! They started much earlier in Spider-Man's history by giving us Emma Stone as Gwen Stacey. Much, much better in terms of true storyline adherence. In short, the acting was much, much better and tighter for another reboot, which was risky to begin with in my opinion. The best part of the film, was that they never "buffed" Andrew up when he was in the suit. The suit was loose, wrinkly, and he still looked like the little skinny guy that he truly is when Peter Parker. It was awesome that they didn't make Peter some ripped-up muscle-bound hero after the spider bite. Yes, they gave him the necessary augmentations like vision, spider sense, sticky hands and feet, dexterity, etc., but they didn't buff him. I don't know, for someone who's a Spider-Man purist like me, I thought this was a well-thought-out execution of the character. He looks feeble, even in the suit, and that really helped me root for the underdog even more. The Lizard, played by Rhys Ifans, was massive compared to our Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man, which made the fights look awesome. Regarding character development, the storyline differences between Raimi's first film and this one aren't very big. Uncle Ben is still killed "accidentally" by a rogue criminal that Peter arrogantly lets go to "get even" with some minor injustice. The "with great power comes great responsibility" mantra is still intact, and it's a good lesson to learn...and painful in most instances. But Peter's scientific side is much, much more developed in this film because his webbing isn't organically engineered from his own body (as in Raimi's depiction). As in the comic books, Peter is a scientific genius, and develops his own webbing and shooters. Oscorp as a military industrial complex is also much more developed, though we never see hide nor hair of Norman or his son in this film. In summary, I think this reboot of my favorite comic book character of all time is well-done, surpassing - in my humble opinion - that of Raimi's vision. Marc Webb (really...Webb?) did a great job directing and the on-screen outcome is nothing short of brilliant. I'm very excited for the next installment. Review: Everything previous Spider-Man films should have been. - While this film isn't a magnum opus of Super Hero films, it improves on the Spider Man franchise's previous offerings in spades. While I was apprehensive of Gwen Stacy's selection as Peter's main squeeze in this particular movie, I think it was a wise choice by the studio and writers. Much is done to distance this movie from the previous offerings, as the plot leaps along through Peter Parker's life and background without feeling rushed. Most of the parts are well acted, though I have to give kudos to Spider Man, Gwen Stacy and Gwen's father in particular as stand out roles in this film. Gwen's father comes out at the beginning seeming like a character the audience is supposed to dislike because of how him and Peter interact. But you never quite get there and I find myself admiring the steadfast manner of the character. The pacing works for the film and I think it moves the story along at a relatively reasonable rate. As with most Marvel films, you'll find that the movie follows a relatively well developed formula that involves so much exposition before settling into a faster, action-filled pace towards the end of the movie. The end DID feel a little rushed as the plot struggles to tie off all of the lose ends that are meant to be tied off in short order. But I also think they made an effort to segue into the next movie that makes it work a little bit better. This is a movie that was made with a sequel in mind, and without trying to shoehorn Spiderman into the Avengers, though he's been one of their headlining members in the comics for some time. I think if Spidey is going to be on the Avengers, the Disney/Marvel writers are trying to grow him up a little before he is. I think Spider-Man easily stands on it's own among the Marvel films, and for their individual hero films is one of the better movies in the Marvel Film franchises.
| ASIN | B07VPQV5J5 |
| Aspect Ratio | 2.40:1 |
| Audio Description: | English |
| Best Sellers Rank | #123,336 in Movies & TV ( See Top 100 in Movies & TV ) #7,882 in Action & Adventure Blu-ray Discs |
| Customer Reviews | 4.7 4.7 out of 5 stars (31,720) |
| Dubbed: | Czech, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Turkish |
| MPAA rating | PG (Parental Guidance Suggested) |
| Media Format | 4K, Import |
| Number of discs | 2 |
| Product Dimensions | 0.63 x 6.9 x 5.34 inches; 3.53 ounces |
| Release date | July 26, 2019 |
| Studio | Sony Import |
| Subtitles: | Cantonese, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Lithuanian, Mandarin Chinese, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Spanish, Swedish, Thai, Turkish |
A**S
An unnecessary, but very well-done reboot
One thing I wish about Spider-Man: that Sony would release the contract to Marvel Studios so Spidey can be in the Avengers where he belongs. But until that glorious day, Spidey will be forced to live on the silver screen all alone with a set of villains that have yet to be in the movies. Sure, I think I read that The Rhino will be in the next one, which is great since Rhino is one of the classics that, until modern CGI technology, couldn't really be done the right way. The previous three films by Sam Raimi were amazing...well, the first two were amazing, but not number three. Ick, not number three. I mean, Topher Grace as Eddie Brock? Did they even read the comic books? Come on Sam, no wonder there was a needed reboot just a few years later. And why throw in the Sandman AND Green Goblin's son back into the mix? It was too much, and therefore nothing was done to the fullest. In my opinion, they should've just stuck to the Venom suit and cast someone much more comic-book-related as Eddie Brock...someone with a more sinister voice. OK, this is just a ranting history lesson leading up to the real review of the reboot. I LOVED this film for many, many reasons. First, the casting was much more well-done. Andrew Garfield plays a much more believable Peter Parker (lankier, goofier, and much more natural on-screen as a nerd than Toby MacGuire). And they didn't include Mary Jane! They started much earlier in Spider-Man's history by giving us Emma Stone as Gwen Stacey. Much, much better in terms of true storyline adherence. In short, the acting was much, much better and tighter for another reboot, which was risky to begin with in my opinion. The best part of the film, was that they never "buffed" Andrew up when he was in the suit. The suit was loose, wrinkly, and he still looked like the little skinny guy that he truly is when Peter Parker. It was awesome that they didn't make Peter some ripped-up muscle-bound hero after the spider bite. Yes, they gave him the necessary augmentations like vision, spider sense, sticky hands and feet, dexterity, etc., but they didn't buff him. I don't know, for someone who's a Spider-Man purist like me, I thought this was a well-thought-out execution of the character. He looks feeble, even in the suit, and that really helped me root for the underdog even more. The Lizard, played by Rhys Ifans, was massive compared to our Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man, which made the fights look awesome. Regarding character development, the storyline differences between Raimi's first film and this one aren't very big. Uncle Ben is still killed "accidentally" by a rogue criminal that Peter arrogantly lets go to "get even" with some minor injustice. The "with great power comes great responsibility" mantra is still intact, and it's a good lesson to learn...and painful in most instances. But Peter's scientific side is much, much more developed in this film because his webbing isn't organically engineered from his own body (as in Raimi's depiction). As in the comic books, Peter is a scientific genius, and develops his own webbing and shooters. Oscorp as a military industrial complex is also much more developed, though we never see hide nor hair of Norman or his son in this film. In summary, I think this reboot of my favorite comic book character of all time is well-done, surpassing - in my humble opinion - that of Raimi's vision. Marc Webb (really...Webb?) did a great job directing and the on-screen outcome is nothing short of brilliant. I'm very excited for the next installment.
R**I
Everything previous Spider-Man films should have been.
While this film isn't a magnum opus of Super Hero films, it improves on the Spider Man franchise's previous offerings in spades. While I was apprehensive of Gwen Stacy's selection as Peter's main squeeze in this particular movie, I think it was a wise choice by the studio and writers. Much is done to distance this movie from the previous offerings, as the plot leaps along through Peter Parker's life and background without feeling rushed. Most of the parts are well acted, though I have to give kudos to Spider Man, Gwen Stacy and Gwen's father in particular as stand out roles in this film. Gwen's father comes out at the beginning seeming like a character the audience is supposed to dislike because of how him and Peter interact. But you never quite get there and I find myself admiring the steadfast manner of the character. The pacing works for the film and I think it moves the story along at a relatively reasonable rate. As with most Marvel films, you'll find that the movie follows a relatively well developed formula that involves so much exposition before settling into a faster, action-filled pace towards the end of the movie. The end DID feel a little rushed as the plot struggles to tie off all of the lose ends that are meant to be tied off in short order. But I also think they made an effort to segue into the next movie that makes it work a little bit better. This is a movie that was made with a sequel in mind, and without trying to shoehorn Spiderman into the Avengers, though he's been one of their headlining members in the comics for some time. I think if Spidey is going to be on the Avengers, the Disney/Marvel writers are trying to grow him up a little before he is. I think Spider-Man easily stands on it's own among the Marvel films, and for their individual hero films is one of the better movies in the Marvel Film franchises.
S**Z
Spider-Man
Great movie
R**E
Collections are best when completed.
I needed this for my spiderman full collection of the journey taken. Stan Lee's perfection and a memorial to him.
Á**O
Mi película favorita de Spiderman, además de una pasada visualmente. Un 10
D**2
Valutazione spedizione: ottimo. L'articolo è stato consegnato nei tempi previsti, packaging adeguato, pervenuto senza un graffio, qualità essenziale per i collezionisti. Valutazione prodotto: ottimo. Il prodotto corrisponde all'immagine in vetrina e alla descrizione fornita. Contenuto: 1 disco blu-ray (film). Grazie a questo disco ho completato la mia edizione "personale" combo: steelbook (dell'edizione francese) + blu ray (film) + blu ray 3D + contenuti speciali (l'altra versione home video italiana). Valutazione complessiva: ottimo.
R**H
The Amazing Spider-Man 2012, Blu Ray, 2 disc version. Sold & delivered by our main third party seller, on Amazon UK app. Condition as described; no damages to discs, case & sleeve, or outer sleeve. Bought at an excellent price, for the Mrs. I actually avoided this, since it's release, as I WAS keen on the Sam Raimi & Tobey Maguire trilogy. However, Andrew Garfield is utterly convincing as Peter Parker and Spider-Man, with the best Spider-Man suite and eye lenses! Emma Stone the best, and original, love interest, as Gwen Stacy. Excellent cinematography, with a natural image, upscaling on our 4K UPSCALER compact Panasonic DMP-BTP180 (See my review on amazon.de) & SONY 43" WF66 Smart TV (See my review on Amazon UK.) The fighting is well choreographed, with mainly athletic & gymnastics movements, rather than the popular, but obviously CGI, and excessively flexible body joints; with gravity defying, unsurvivable mayhem. The Lizard is a believable villain. Disappointing that Garfield only made 2; but as he was contracted for 3, he returns as Spider-Man, along with Tobey Maguire as Spider-Man, in the light hearted 2021 Tom Holland "Spider-Man: No Way Home" multiverse epic. This version highly recommended for production quality, and price. Mrs also thinks highly of this film, and has the Tom Holland Spider-Man trilogy on Blu Ray. We still have to watch Amazing Spider-Man 2.
C**E
Ceci est une critique du The Amazing Spider-Man - Edition premium limitée double blu-ray boîtier métal [Blu-ray] ; je ne sais pas ce que vaut la 3D, j'évite les films au ciné en 3D la voyant assez mal et je trouve que cela n'apporte jamais grand chose pour les films "live" comparé aux films d'animation. J'ai adoré les Films de Sam Raimi si l'on exclut le 3ème qui était particulièrement mauvais. En revanche, je vais le dire tout net, le choix de faire jeu-vidéo pour les effets spéciaux dans les Raimi m'a toujours irritée. Cela donnait de très très mauvaises scènes d'acrobatie et ça ne rendait pas trop le rendu de l'homme araignée. Webb a pris un parti tout autre : les scènes où l'on voit Spider-man se balader des "liane" en "liane" font véritablement hommage aux comics. Ce qui est encore plus incroyable c'est lorsque l'on voit le documentaire de 1h30 qui montre les coulisses du tournage et des cascades et comment ils ont intégré la réalité à la numérisation. Et pourquoi le rendu des scènes d'action donne vraiment l'impression que c'est réel et pas de la numérisation. Pour cela, tous les bonus de ce Blu-ray sont assez fantastiques, on prend autant de plaisir à voir le film que de consulter ses bonus. Quant au son et à l'image du blu-ray : impeccable. On se croirait au cinéma. Mon seul regret c'est le choix de le compacter avec les fameuses bandes noires du 16/9 alors qu'on aurait pu avoir une image en plein écran (comme sur le BR des Avengers par exemple). Aussi intéressant, pas de bêtisier. je suppose qu'il y a peut-être un easter egg quelque part mais je ne l'ai pas encore trouvé et je n'ai pas vraiment cherché sur le net pour voir s'il existait. Quant à Andrew Garfield, c'est de très loin un meilleur choix que Tobey Mcguire (que mon cœur de midinette de l'époque aimait pourtant beaucoup) : il est plus présent, plus charismatique. Le personnage est montré comme l'être intelligent des BD, ce qui n'était pas aussi développé dans les Raimi même si on nous le dit. Et le choix d'avoir Gwen Stacy à la place de M.J. est excellent, non seulement parce qu'Emma Stone est l'une des actrices les plus adorables et vivantes de ces derniers 5 ans mais aussi parce que l'alchimie entre les deux acteurs crève l'écran. On rajoutera aussi que le méchant est un méchant avec un peu plus d'épaisseur que ceux de Raimi et ceci en fait une histoire d'origine particulièrement efficace. Pas un seul personnage ne donne l'impression d'être unidimensionnel et si l'on peut regretter certains choix dans le montage qui nous ait expliqué aussi dans les bonus, le tout est une merveille à regarder. Image : 4/5 (à cause des bandes noires) Son : 5/5 Bonus : 5/5
N**N
We recently watched this movie in 3D, and the effects were incredible! They were some of the best 3D effects I've seen, adding a whole new level of excitement to the action sequences. The movie itself was also very enjoyable, with a great story and fantastic acting. If you have a 3D TV and you're a fan of superhero movies, I highly recommend checking this one out!
Trustpilot
2 weeks ago
1 month ago