Deliver to Kenya
IFor best experience Get the App
Jane FondaBarefoot in the Park
B**K
The America in the film no longer exists, but human nature never changes
This movie is about two incredibly beautiful human beings, Paul and Corey Bratter (Robert Redford and Jane Fonda) who fall in love and get married. It's a comedy, but what's so funny about that premise? Lots. This is an adaptation of the Broadway hit written by the great Neil Simon. The story takes place in the 1960's, so the convention of not having sex or moving in together until you get married is what no longer exists. So what never changes? How beautiful young people act when they first start having sex, and how they act when they start living together, share the same space and start socializing as a couple. Nowadays you don't have to be married to go through all that, but you can definitely relate to the problems that arise when a man and woman begin to share the same living space. There's lots of comic material there. However, these two happen to be perfectly compatible only in the bedroom--they are polar opposites in personality. She is fun and personable, loves adventure, new people and new places. She finds humor and beauty in everything, and she's a little over the top emotionally too. He is serious--really, awfully, terribly serious. He folds his tie when he takes it off, for crying out loud. He's all about business--he's more excited about working all night on his first legal case for the firm that just hired him than having a great night in his new apartment with his gorgeous (whatever you think politically about Jane Fonda she is world-class gorgeous) and very sexually motivated (OK, horny) wife. Do they have a difference of opinion? Oh, you bet. Do they really love each other? It takes a while for them to figure that out, and you get to enjoy every minute of it. There's also a 50-year-old globe-trotting adventurer living above them who's been married 4 times and loves women. Corey decides he's just the thing for her very conservative, widowed mother who "needs to get out more". You will see a great gag involving a lot of stairs and no elevator. I wonder if that was the inspiration for the broken elevator situation in The Big Bang Theory. The only thing I didn't like about the film was how the camera always managed to look up Jane Fonda's miniskirt but I suppose the character really didn't care. She bids her new husband goodbye as he leaves for work from their honeymoon suite in front of an elevator full of people. She is wearing only one of his shirts and says, "Goodby, Mr. Bratter, stop by the next time you're in New York." She is playful. Is he shocked? What do you think? This is a great film with wonderful actors, and it does have a lesson in it. Very fun film.
A**R
A review of the new BLU-RAY. other reviews are other formats and should be ignored. See below.
Let's be clear right away - every other review on this page are for other formats, NOT the new Blu-ray. If you're on the Blu-ray page, Amazon has simply bunched all the reviews together, a practice they should stop. Let's also be clear about my rating - the film itself is FIVE STARTS - it's great, it's always been great, it's hilarious, endearing, and brilliantly acted by Mr. Redford, Ms. Fonda, and especially Ms. Natwick. Only Boyer is slightly annoying and it's a shame that Kurt Kazner, who created the role, couldn't have done the film, since Mr. Boyer, at that time, meant nothing to the box-office. Special shout out to Herb Edelman as the telephone man, who, like Redford and Natwick, was repeating the role he created on Broadway. And the score by Neal Hefts is fantastic. So, why THREE stars? Read on, MacDuff.While it's laudable that Paramount has begun releasing some of its very late to Blu-ray catalog titles, they are using old transfers and it's really super annoying. Treat your films with respect, Paramount, especially ones that made you a boatload of dough, as this one did. The color is fine, the close-ups are pretty good, but the medium and long shots are soft as can be, with no clarity and/or detail at all. It's shameful - this could and should look great. It's the same story with The Sons of Katie Elder and everything in this inexpensive line. This and other films deserve better AND your protecting your library for the future. Spend the money now and give people a top product AND you'll have great transfers for streaming instead of these older things which simply don't pass muster now.
P**R
Fun 60s Romp
Great nostalgic look of more mainstream 1960s. This is the New York City I love, and miss. It's note the over built nightmare it's become where more out of towners than we natives live here.Love Jane's classic, and almost entirely wearable today, clothes! This pre-feminist film still manages to suggest where things might be going, as carefree Corey's Bohemian aspirations clash with Paul's regular guy and bread winner's values. The idea that a young woman would call herself a home maker in that tiny place while her professional husband works everyday is absurd now. But that was Hollywood and Barefoot in the Park is a fun, and hopeful ride with a sweet upbeat score to match.
N**E
Adorable timeless film
I love this movie. One of my favorites since I was a little girl and still a favorite in my older years. In other words a timeless classic. Robert Redford is so handsome and Jane Fonda is not only beautiful but also adorable. Charming film about newlyweds, adjusting to their new lives together and coming to terms with their differences. The mother of the bride is hysterical. I love it!
K**T
Obnoxious and silly
Robert Redford is always entertaining to watch, even in a bad movie. The reviews of this movie are great. The movie is awful. Not a fan of Jane Fonda, this movie proves why. This movie is typical of late 60s mentality, annoying. It is not well acted, and the plot is absurd. I don't agree this movie is outdated. There are old movies that are funny and well done. This movie is just poorly written and acted.
T**O
Juat was not entertaining
I remember seeing this movie while I was in high school (1967). I remember leaving the theater asking myself where were the laughs. Thought I would try it again now (2020) Still asking myself where are the laughs. Worse, 25 minutes into the film and I just wanted Jane Fonda's character to just shut up already. Putting political views aside, Jane and Robert are fine actors, but the movie just did not have it for me, since the characters were just plain silly.
R**S
They don't make them like this anymore
One oddity of this film is that, although made in 1967, the Summer of Love, you would never know this from the way it looks This is explained by its origin in a Neil Simon play that debuted on Broadway four years earlier, which in turn was based on Neil Simon’s early married life in the 1950s.The Broadway run, the most successful of Simon’s plays, meant that the humour had been thoroughly road tested, and the result is a film full of laughs, however dated the setting. Many of these come from the performance of Mildred Natwick, who earned a deserved Oscar nomination. (She had a similar role in Hitchcock’s The Trouble with Harry, two years earlier, opposite one of his favourite actors, Edmund Gwenn)Robert Redford as Paul Bratter shows a previously unexpected talent for comedy and there is real chemistry between him and Jane Fonda, as Corie Bratter.The story covers the first few days of a couple’s marriage, and the setting, apart from their honeymoon in the Plaza Hotel, is mainly in their new apartment. This is at the top of a five-storey house in Greenwich Village leading to a running gag about all their visitors arriving breathless.It quickly becomes apparent that the disparity between Redford’s conventional lawyer Paul, and Fonda’s free spirited Corie is a cause of friction (another sign of the times is that she does not appear to have a job). Chuck Lorre’s more recent TV series, Dharma and Greg mined a similar seam of comedy.Another free spirit, Victor Velasco lives in the building’s attic and takes the couple and her mother to an Albanian restaurant on Staten Island, resulting in a contrasting reaction from Corie and Paul. This provokes a row when the couple return home, but her mother and Victor, after an accident, discover they have more in common than she thought, and that he has to recognise he is getting older.Of course, all ends happily with Paul becoming less of a stuffed shirt, and Corie realising that there is something to be said for reliability. And the audience too should feel happier: if, as they say, laughter is the best medicine, there is plenty on offer here.
J**S
Innocent days. Or maybe not so innocent.
They don't make films like this any more. Not a single cuss-word in two hours of marital comedy. No nudity. No bittersweet savagery. What on earth is going on here? The bride's mother isn't quite sure where her clothes have got to. Funny eh? Balkan cuisine burns your mouth. That's really funny. A drunk takes off his shoes and raises a ruckus in the park. Hilarious. BUT ... there is a couple who share the newlyweds apartment block. This (invisible) couple are of the same sex, though nobody is quite sure which sex that is. These days, a joke like that could destroy your career and might even put you inside. I enjoyed the film as a trip back in a time capsule. Innocent days. Or, when you think about it, maybe not so innocent.
I**I
One of the Best Films Ever!
This is one of Neil Simon's best. He was a fantastic writer and just raced home with this genre so well.The story is about two newlyweds Paul and Corie Bratter (Redford and Fonda). Paul is a very staid lawyer and Corie is his bright, bubbly and adventurous wife, and the story centres around first few weeks of the couples' marriage. The peripheral characters are Corie's mother, played by Mildred Natwick and Victor Velasco, played by Charles Boyer.This film is dated, but it's hilarious. It's warm and light-hearted and all just-coming-out-of-the-50's-white-middle-class, but it does work as a feelgood film. And the gorgeous Robert Redford is surprisingly funny! But it's Mildred Natwick, that steals the show in my eyes. Her timing and facial expressions are priceless. The scene where Robert Redford carries her up the stairs is one that will stay in my mind forever.I laughed, cried, cried with laughter, wanted it to turn out alright in the end. And it did. I'm not spoiling it, but come on, look at the cover, you must know everyone has a HEA. :-)
E**!
Great movie.
Found this to be an enjoyable comedy. Although Redford's character is supposedly a stuffed shirt, he was so comical and spontaneous I could not fathom when he lost this ability in later productions.Fonda's portrayal of a light hearted lover was a perfect foil to her family, neighbors, and friends. It was an interesting aspect that she always lit up when referencing their five day love nest Honeymoon at the Plaza.High recommend for light comedy, young Redford and Fonda, 60's Village New York and that initial glow of romance.
C**.
A fun taste of 1967 New York life.
Robert Redford & Jane Fonda have an obvious chemistry that comes across well on the screen. The movie is based on the play of the same name,and has translated easily to the screen. Mildred Natwick as the mother of Jane Fonda,delivers many memorable and amusing one-liners,such as: "If you follow my advice,you will have a happy marriage,like two of every ten couples."The soundtrack and the general look of the film have dated,but for me that added to the charm of the film,and Redford and Fonda both look great here. This is a fun and unpretentious piece of late 60s movie history. Unfortunately there are no bonus features or extras on this DVD.
Trustpilot
1 month ago
2 weeks ago